Y-Jesus.com

Evidence for the truth about Jesus

  • Home
  • Who Is the Real Jesus?
    • Who Is the Real Jesus?
    • Was Jesus a Real Person?
    • Was there a Jesus Conspiracy?
    • Is Jesus God?
    • Are the Gospels Reliable?
    • Is Jesus the Jewish Messiah?
    • Did Jesus Rise From the Dead?
    • Is Jesus Relevant Today?
  • More Questions?
    • Why Does God Permit Evil to Exist?
    • Is Jesus Coming Back?
    • Did Jesus Claim to be God?
    • Did the Apostles Believe Jesus is God?
    • Is Jesus the Only Way to God?
    • The Jesus Family Tomb: Fact or Fiction?
    • Was Jesus Really from Nazareth?
    • Why Were Other Gospels Excluded from the New Testament?
    • The Gospel of Barnabas: Secret Bible?
    • Is the Bible True?
    • Has Science Discovered God?
  • Blog
    • Historical Jesus
    • Who is Jesus?
    • Claims of Jesus
    • New Testament Reliability
    • Origins of Life
    • Resurrection of Jesus
    • Our Life and Death
    • Accuracy of Scriptures
  • APP
  • Resources & More
    • Free Books
    • Videos
    • Resources for Pastors
    • Read in Other Languages
    • Contact
  • Search

The Lost Gospel: Truth or Fiction?

November 14, 2014 by helmut

Radical Claims of The Lost Gospel

The book, The Lost Gospel, is based upon one solitary manuscript purchased by the British Museum in 1847 from an Egyptian monastery. The document has been there for 160 years, and has been studied by a few scholars. But no one has considered it to be historically significant–until Jacobovici and Wilson began speculating it is really a coded history of Jesus Christ.

Let’s look at the key facts about this document, which is a portion of the Ecclesiastical History of Zacharias Rhetor:

  • The 29-chapter text dates back to 570 AD.
  • It is written on vellum in the Syriac language (related to Aramaic).
  • It is written by an unknown author.
  • The “gospel” is entitled, Joseph and Aseneth.

Wilson and Jacobovici interpret the love story of Joseph and Aseneth as an allegory for Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Central to their claim is that Joseph was actually a code name for Jesus — and that Aseneth was actually a code name for Mary Magdalene.[10]

Dr. Robert R. Cargill, Assistant Professor of Classics and Religious Studies at the University of Iowa notes,

By that same allegorical logic, you could swap out the names of Samson and Delilah and claim that Mary Magdalene cut Jesus’ hair. Or swap out Adam and Eve and conclude that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were the primordial couple. Or read David and Bathsheba allegorically and end up with Jesus having a son named Solomon, who is guarded by the Priory of Sion, and…well, you get the picture.[11]

In other words, the entire premise for believing this 6th century manuscript is another gospel of Jesus Christ is based on the authors’ assumption that the names Joseph and Aseneth refer to Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

Although world scholars don’t seem to be taking The Lost Gospel seriously, several Jesus-conspiracists, including some mass media outlets certainly are.

Assuming that Jacobovici and Wilson are correct about their interpretation of the names Joseph and Aseneth, let’s see if any actual facts substantiate their claims about Jesus.

Click here to read page 4 of 5 of “The Lost Gospel”

.

.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Previous | Next

Filed Under: Claims of Jesus, Crucifixion of Jesus, Da Vinci Code, Historical Jesus, Mary Magdalene, New Testament Reliability, Resurrection of Jesus, The Lost Gospel, Who is Jesus? Tagged With: Barrie Wilson, Jesus and Mary Magdalene, Jesus married, Simcha Jacobovici, The Lost Gospel

Want More?

Discover the evidence for Jesus’ true identity. 

Download Book

Get all these website articles plus more in our app.

Explore JO App

Watch the Videos Series:
“Who is the Real Jesus?”

Watch Videos

  • About Us
  • Other Languages
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 2026 - JesusOnline